Course Code: REL-ABA-0-ADVWEB5
Type: Online Course
Content Expiration Date: 4/30/2020
List the factors that can affect whether it is feasible to conduct a functional analysis.
Describe how brief functional analyses differ from the method of functional analysis described by Iwata et al. (1982/1994).
Describe at least three alternative formats of functional analysis and the clinical situations to which they are best suited.
Iwata et al., 1982
Factors that Affect the Viability of Conducting an FA
Single Function Test
EO present vs. EO absent
Brief Functional Analysis
Brief Multielement Design
Brief Functional Analysis: Empirical Evaluation
Brief Functional Analysis: Caregivers as Therapists
Trial-Based FA: Empirical Evaluation
Antecedent only “FAs”
The Role of Reinforcement in FAs/DAs
Anderson & Long (2002)
Call et al. (2013)
FA of Precursors
FA of Precursors
Interview Informed Structured Contingency Analysis (IISCA)
IISCA: Empirical Evaluation
Nathan A. Call, PhD, BCBA-D
Dr. Call received his doctorate in school psychology from the University of Iowa in 2003 under the mentorship of David P. Wacker, Ph.D. He completed a predoctoral internship at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics and Center for Disabilities and Development, and a postdoctoral fellowship at the Marcus Autism Center and Emory University under the supervision of Wayne Fisher, Ph.D., and Henry S. Roane, Ph.D. Dr. Call is currently the Interim Clinical Director and Director of the Behavior Analysis Research Core at the Marcus Autism Center. He is also an associate professor in the Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics. Dr. Call’s current research interests include the assessment and treatment of severe behavior disorders as well as the behavioral mechanisms that influence the effectiveness of those assessments and treatments. This work has led him to work with many children diagnosed with autism and other developmental disabilities and their families.
Disclosure: Nathan A. Call, PhD, BCBA-D has declared that no conflict of interest, Relevant Financial Relationship or Relevant Non-Financial Relationship exists.
The target audience for this course is: Behavioral Analyst; in the following settings: Intellectual Developmental Disabilities.
Relias will be transparent in disclosing if any commercial support, sponsorship or co-providership is present prior to the learner completing the course.
Course Delivery Method and Format
Asynchronous/Online Distance Learning; please see certificate details for specifics on delivery format.
Relias has a grievance policy in place to facilitate reports of dissatisfaction. Relias will make every effort to resolve each grievance in a mutually satisfactory manner. In order to report a complaint or grievance please contact Relias
If you require special accommodations to complete this module, please contact Relias Support by completing the web form (https://www.relias.com/help
) or by using the chat functionality.
All courses offered by Relias, LLC are developed from a foundation of diversity, inclusiveness, and a multicultural perspective. Knowledge, values and awareness related to cultural competency are infused throughout the course content.
Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, service mark, manufacturer or otherwise does not constitute or imply any endorsement, recommendation, or favoring of, or affiliation with, Relias, LLC.
All characteristics and organizations referenced in the following training are fictional. Any resemblance to any actual organizations or persons living or dead, is purely coincidental.
To earn continuing education credit for this course you must achieve a passing score of 80% on the post-test and complete the course evaluation.
If you require special accommodations to complete this module, please contact Relias Customer Support here